[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking for ET_EXEC
|
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Subject: |
Re: Checking for ET_EXEC |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2001 20:05:34 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryoae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) |
At Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:53:33 -0500,
Rayiner Hashem wrote:
> is equal to ET_EXEC. This isn't necessarily the best thing to do. It
> is sometimes appropriate to build a kernel as a shared library (.so,
> of type ET_DYN) as it makes kernel modules behave very similar to
> regular userspace modules. You might want to consider removing the
> test for ET_EXEC.
Then, what address does your kernel start at? Does a shared library
get kicked to start with no program? It seems just horrible to me.
Okuji
==============================================================
Are you enbugging Free Software? <URL:http://www.enbug.org/>