[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-grub] [PATCH] Re: address@hidden: Bug#110793: should not secret
From: |
Jason Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-grub] [PATCH] Re: address@hidden: Bug#110793: should not secretly pass options to the kernel] |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:33:03 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.20i |
so this is only needed on older kernels? and isn't this already
configurable using ./configure, my main concern was how many systems
will I break if I change it in the debian package?
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:24:00AM -0400, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:08:14PM +1000, Jason Thomas wrote:
> > Hi can anyone on help with this.
>
> Patch attached (still applies to 0.90)
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111
System Administrator - UID 0 Fax: +61 2 6257 7311
tSA Consulting Group Pty. Ltd. Mobile: 0418 29 66 81
1 Hall Street Lyneham ACT 2602 http://www.topic.com.au/
pgpJrLAMCZvrK.pgp
Description: PGP signature