[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: forking the netboot code
From: |
Rees, Bill |
Subject: |
RE: forking the netboot code |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2001 12:17:41 -0700 |
One vote for UNDI here, at least as a back-up mechanism.
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:40:29 -0700
From: Chip Salzenberg <address@hidden>
To: OKUJI Yoshinori <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
According to OKUJI Yoshinori:
> <URL:http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg03333.html>
No, I didn't see that.
> As you said, Etherboot drivers have defects (for us), but IMO, it is
> NOT feasible to maintain ethernet drivers by ourselves, considerring
> that we are a small community, and the netboot feature of GRUB is an
> "extra" feature anyway. So transition to a more powerful set of
> device drivers would be necessary.
Hm. Has anyone started on this?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <address@hidden>
"We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -- NEAR tech
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- RE: forking the netboot code,
Rees, Bill <=