[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mentio
From: |
John Gardner |
Subject: |
[bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h` |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:32:18 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #63812 (project groff):
[comment #4 comment #4:]
> Here's what I have at the moment.
Looks good. One nanoscopic nitpick, which borders on bikeshedding:
> and GNU @code{troff} may provide additional operators in the future.
The projected likelihood of introducing such a backwards-incompatible feature
is marginal at best, and indicative of feature creep at worst. I wouldn't rule
the possibility out completely, but it's still not likely enough to warrant
mentioning in Groff's documentation.
(I told you it was a nitpickā¦)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63812>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`,
John Gardner <=
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, John Gardner, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, John Gardner, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/05
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/09
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/13
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/13
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/22
- [bug #63812] Discussion of conditional expressions in docs should mention `.if h`, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/03/22