[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #61423] [libgroff] allow paths in "name" directive of font descript
|
From: |
Dave |
|
Subject: |
[bug #61423] [libgroff] allow paths in "name" directive of font description file, restoring historical groff behavior |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:20:46 -0500 (EST) |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 |
Follow-up Comment #14, bug #61423 (project groff):
[comment #13 comment #13:]
> Would you agree that the present behavior of groff in Git
> conforms to your option B?
Yes. And, if I'm understanding correctly, also to your option 1.
> No one has raised Cain about this (or even uttered a peep in
> protest), so I reckon I will leave it until it draws complaint.
OK. So the remaining questions are:
* Is this a NEWS-worthy change?
* Does this warrant a bug report against afmtodit?
Comment #9 seems to call for at least two other tickets, in its "In the short
term" and "In the longer term" paragraphs.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61423>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/