Re: Static class member initialization buggy?

[Johnny Wezel]

address@hidden (?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr?P?itz?) wrote in message 
news:<address@hidden>...
> Johnny Wezel <address@hidden> wrote:
> > a) a bug in GNU C++
> > b) not allowed to be used this way
> 
> This is neither. It is allowed and should work as expected. Are your five
> classes perhaps all derived from class X and you have only one counter?
> If not, could you provide a minimalistic example that compiles
> out-of-the-box and shows that behaviour? Two classes and 50 lines should 
> be
> enough...
> 
> Andre'

I've done that, and it works as expected. This indicates there's a bug
somewhere. I try to figure out what's going on.

Johnny