Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours

[Mail Delivery Subsystem]

    **********************************************
    **      THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY      **
    **  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
    **********************************************

The original message was received at Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:15:54 +0200 (EET)
from boy.univ.kiev.ua [193.125.78.120]

   ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
<address@hidden>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.gnu.org.:
>>> MAIL From:<address@hidden> SIZE=1661
<<< 451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender address (try again later) 
<address@hidden>
<address@hidden>... Deferred: 451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender 
address (try again later) <address@hidden>
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old

Reporting-MTA: dns; univ-gw.univ.kiev.ua
Arrival-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:15:54 +0200 (EET)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; bug-lib-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu
Action: delayed
Status: 4.3.0
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender 
address (try again later) <ant@boy.univ.kiev.ua>
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 01:40:28 +0200 (EET)
Will-Retry-Until: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 21:15:54 +0200 (EET)
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> using sockets by the fstream interface
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:15:53 +0200 (EET)
>
>
>
>
> Dear gurus, at first I want to ask you forgiveness for my english, because i'm
> just an ukrainian...
>
> So, when i developed the client/server progect, I wanted my server to be on C++
> and use sockets.
> I prefere to work with c++ standart iostream library and wanted to work with
> sockets by fstream interface. But... it didn't work.
> I've tried to work with sockets by standart C FILE interface: all was fine but
> with C++'s fstream not. It didn't work only when program was alredy builded: on
> the stage of compiling and linking all was fine. So, after the long period of
> seeking bug it seems to me that i've found it. This was year ago and because of
> this i can't explain why it works: the long period, and i have not time to
> parse it again for explanation maby you as developers will understand this
> little change. The contents of patch file is this:
>
>
> --- libio/fileops.c     Wed Mar  1 15:51:02 2000
> +++ fileops.c   Wed Mar  1 15:54:31 2000
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@
>         Instead, just indicate that offset (before and after) is
>         unpredictable. */
>      fp->_offset = _IO_pos_BAD;
> -  else if (fp->_IO_read_end != fp->_IO_write_base)
> +  else if (fp->_IO_read_end != fp->_IO_write_base && fp->_offset != 
> _IO_pos_BAD)
>      {
>        _IO_pos_t new_pos
>         = _IO_SYSSEEK (fp, fp->_IO_write_base - fp->_IO_read_end, 1);
>
>
> That's all! My only goal is to improve your soft for my soft will work by
> compiling on other mashines with your new perfect gcc :)
>
> Thank you very mutch for attention.
> My best regards.
> PS: If you please, reply me with results of inspection of this problem.
>   Andrey Tkachuk
>   ICQ: 77275730
> --
> 15 ноя  Niagara Falls power plant startup, 1896
>
> --- End Message ---