Re: module c-nullptr: error compiling groff

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> It seems unlikely that a compiler would 
> advertise conformance to C++11 without supporting nullptr.

Here's a case where a compiler advertises conformance to C++11 without
supporting all that's needed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44871

I'm sure there are more examples like this.

Bruno