[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: source builds vs. RPMs
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: source builds vs. RPMs |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:19:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday, June 04, 2010 05:05:56 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Where does the thinking come from that it is bad to have something not
> recognized by the package system?
because it is bad. i rarely install packages onto my system anymore without a
way of tracking them via my PM. if i do, i leverage DISTDIR first, and cherry
pick what i want into /usr/local.
packages install way too much cruft that changes over versions to sanely track
without a PM, and `make uninstall` is way too inconsistent and "helpful" to
even think about trusting.
as for sticking things in /usr/local vs /usr, having different versions
simultaneously with most packages just breaks things.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles, (continued)
- Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles, Bruno Haible, 2010/06/03
- Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles, Richard W.M. Jones, 2010/06/03
- Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles, Richard W.M. Jones, 2010/06/03
- source builds vs. RPMs (was: Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles), Bruno Haible, 2010/06/03
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs (was: Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles), Richard W.M. Jones, 2010/06/04
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs, Bruno Haible, 2010/06/04
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs, Richard W.M. Jones, 2010/06/04
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs, Bruno Haible, 2010/06/05
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs, Mike Frysinger, 2010/06/05
- Re: source builds vs. RPMs,
Mike Frysinger <=
Re: gettext 0.18 grumbles, Jim Meyering, 2010/06/03