[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] Version 1.1 Bug in File-Control ?
From: |
Alain |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] Version 1.1 Bug in File-Control ? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:30:13 +0100 |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:19:41 +0100
Roger While <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Indeed, it is defined internally which is what MF does.
> You will get a warning if you specify "-Wall" when compiling -
>
> # cobc -Wall -free mffile.cob
> mffile.cob:2: Warning: AUTHOR is obsolete in OpenCOBOL
> mffile.cob:3: Warning: DATE-COMPILED is obsolete in OpenCOBOL
> mffile.cob:20: Warning: DATA RECORDS is obsolete in OpenCOBOL
> mffile.cob:28: Warning: 'INFILE-FILE-NAME' will be implicitly defined
>
> Essentially, OC is silent as per MF unless specific warning options
> are given.
>
> Roger
>
Roger,
MF is not the better cobol, even it is the most solded.
Try to have the same name in a copy-book and in the working of a program.
No error with MF, same with ACU and impossible to compile with tiny,
for what i have used O-C in a first time.
IMHO, any name in procedure division not present in data division must be
give as an error and any name in double also ... else wich is taken ?
Regards,
--
Alain <address@hidden>