[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field
From: |
Alain Lucari |
Subject: |
Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field |
Date: |
Fri Nov 14 10:35:25 2003 |
Le Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:06:28 +0900
Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> a écrit:
>
> Sure. But it seems that the standard does not explicitly specify
> how numeric accept should work. I think implementing the
> "intuitive" behavior is good enough here.
For me, you are right in this.
I think that the "standard" implicitly refer to "accept" on an
alphanumeric field.
... and how this is treated by TC seem good for me.
>
> I don't read the newsgroup, and I don't want to take too much
> time on this topic. Just give me an advice how open-cobol
> should work.
>
Like TC, because it is the "BON SENS".
Regards,
--
Alain Lucari (Eurlix)
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, (continued)
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Thomas Biehler, 2003/11/10
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Keisuke Nishida, 2003/11/10
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, masterok, 2003/11/11
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Alain Lucari, 2003/11/11
- RE: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, William M. Klein, 2003/11/11
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Alain Lucari, 2003/11/12
- [open-cobol-list] MOVE Statement (was: possibly bug: accept into numeric field, William M. Klein, 2003/11/12
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Thomas Biehler, 2003/11/11
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Bernard Giroud, 2003/11/11
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Keisuke Nishida, 2003/11/14
- Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field,
Alain Lucari <=
Re: [open-cobol-list] possibly bug: accept into numeric field, Thomas Biehler, 2003/11/14