[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: current development
From: |
Philippe Michel |
Subject: |
Re: current development |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:41:01 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:28:04AM +0000, Sarah Payne wrote:
> For sure, I would expect gnu still to have some playing strengths
> against xg. That’s what is so impressive: how it’s still as strong as
> it is with no new recent versions.
You wording is somewhat confusing. The last major versions of GNUbg
(1.0x) are more recent than XG2.
It went something like : GNUbg 0.90, then XG1 (about 5 Elo points
stronger at 2ply/GNU 3ply/XG), then XG2 (about 15 points stronger than
XG1), then GNUbg 1.0 (about 15 points stronger than 0.90 and 5 points
short of XG2). In addition, XG has its roller levels that give it
another advantage.
It was a bit disappointing to remain slightly weaker than XG2 but enough
of an improvement over GNUbg 0.90 to be worth releasing as it was rather
than wait for hypothetical further improvements.
- RE: current development, Sarah Payne, 2020/01/25
- Re: current development, pviau, 2020/01/25
- RE: current development, Sarah Payne, 2020/01/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: current development, Sarah Payne, 2020/01/29
- Re: current development, pviau, 2020/01/29
- Re: current development, Terje Pedersen, 2020/01/29
- Re: current development,
Philippe Michel <=
- Re: current development, Joseph Heled, 2020/01/29
- Re: current development, Philippe Michel, 2020/01/29
Re: current development, Simon Woodhead, 2020/01/29
Re: current development, Philippe Michel, 2020/01/29