Re: [Bug-gnubg] Is GNUBG actively developed?

[Philippe Michel]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Stelios Togias wrote:

> I was just wondering if is GnuBG being actively developed. Not so much as
> in the GUI/program part as in the neural networks part. Is it considered
> mature or there's still training and maybe improvement taking place?

I have been training new neural nets (with the input features unchanged) 
for some time and I'm almost done with it.

With them, gnubg should get significantly better on average and (as far as 
I can see), suffer from few gross regressions in specific positions. It 
would most probably still be a little weaker than eXtreme Gammon 2, 
though.

I posted a link to intermediate results there : 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-09/msg00008.html