bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fedora Core 4 Build Problem


From: Thomas A. Moulton
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fedora Core 4 Build Problem
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:06:11 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Those changes alone seem to fix everything, I need to run a few more tests but so far so good.

The only other problem I see is that html.c and play.c do not have #include <time.h> in them

tom

Christian Anthon wrote:
The crash was caused by a bug in the code, only visable when memory
mapping failed or was disabled. I've checked in a fix for your compile
problem and for the bug as well.

My own guide-line to when a system is too old is debian stable, but it
is possible that some or all of your problems are present on currently
supported rhel systems, and I believe we should support those as well
(if possible without too much code pollution). So send me a diff of
what you need to do, and I'll take a look.

Christian.



On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Thomas A. Moulton <address@hidden> wrote:
It related to the bearoff database, once I removed those files it works, but
naturally makes errors.

Any suggestions?

tom

Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
Well... it was acting up and I played via tty and after a while got:

Considering move...Segmentation fault

I guess we removed too much code :)


Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
Ok I was able to install the built version.

What else should we do? (i do have write privs btw)

Is my system that unique (aka old) that we can leave well enough alone?

I assume the built version should work ok, right?

tom


On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Thomas A. Moulton <address@hidden>
wrote:

Yes that is strange.


Kind of. It is a bug in old versions of autoconf. You can delete the
matching lines in configure.in if you need to run configure more than
once.


I removed them and rebuilt and then it failed on

bearoff.h line 50 - GMappedFile seems to not be defined

It's a data type, struct?

Yeah, it is an impolite way of telling you that you glib library is
too old. Try the attached patch, and we'll see how far we get.

Christian.



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]