[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map
From: |
Jonathan Kinsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:01:03 +0000 |
It is down to semantics a bit, beta 1 ~ .91, it doesn't really matter. I think
version 1 is probably 3-6 months away (maybe less or more...).
For the translations I think we need some very easy to follow instructions
(especially on windows), I'll take a look soon. I may have a go at the
Icelandic translation as well!... If we get a simple to follow system we can
send a few emails out and hopefully get lots of progress.
Jon
Christian Anthon wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I totally agree that we should be close to 1.0 and that between the
> two of us, we should be able to get the code in a reasonably good
> state in a short time.
>
> Where we will need help and where non-programmers can easily
> contribute is in writing translations and updating the documentation.
> The translations are the biggest problem. cs, it and de are largely
> done. fr and ja are about 50% done. The rest are in a state where they
> do more harm than good.
>
> Also we simply need the code to be tested by more users under
> different environments.
>
> For these two things to happen I believe it might be a good idea to
> call the current code 1.0-beta1 so that people can see that we are
> close to 1.0 and committed to make only a few changes from here on.
>
> Christian.
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Kinsey
> wrote:
>> I know it's tricky to have any sort of release road map for gnubg, as there
>> are only a few developers coming and going and largely doing what they want,
>> it's been a goal of mine for a while to get to a "version 1" release though,
>> so here's a plan that may get us there...
>>
>> After the recent flurry of small changes I suggest we release a version
>> numbered 0.90, then when we've done some more changes 0.91 and so on for a
>> few (one to three/four?) versions until we're happy enough that with
>> everything to release a version 1.0. So it might go something like:
>>
>> 0.90 current code
>> 0.91 some 3d stuff and start on database reports + ...
>> 0.92 other changes/bug fixes...
>> 0.93 documentation (web site + help)
>> 1.0 translations and bug fixes
>>
>> The idea being that version 1.0 is basically the current code with some
>> features finished off/rationalised, which means that any large code rewrite
>> or major change should wait until after version 1.
>>
>> It might be better to have a build number as well so version 0.901 is the
>> first build of 0.90 and then if any important fixes are needed we can have a
>> 0.902 build, etc. Which would make it easier to check what code someone is
>> using.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Free games, great prizes - get gaming at Gamesbox.
>> http://www.searchgamesbox.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx
- [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Jonathan Kinsey, 2008/03/17
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Christian Anthon, 2008/03/17
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Russ Allbery, 2008/03/17
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Achim Mueller, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Russ Allbery, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Christian Anthon, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Achim Mueller, 2008/03/27
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Christian Anthon, 2008/03/28
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map, Achim Mueller, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Road map,
Jonathan Kinsey <=