|
From: | Joseph Heled |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Problems with latest Windows Build |
Date: | Sat, 06 Nov 2004 01:06:58 +1300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 |
Definitely. If you don't get something like less than 1% difference in move selection (for "interesting" moves) then something is still wrong.
I am sorry about the bug, but I could not solve it until I got a good example ... -Joseph -Joseph Jim Segrave wrote:
On Fri 05 Nov 2004 (14:11 +1300), Joseph Heled wrote:This is the way to report problems - with an explicit example.Good news found a bug (order of crashed and race nets was reversed) - making crashed /race prune results complete nonsense.I am submitting a fix now.Shall I rerun my match database through this version to get a new set of stats on differences with the pre-pruning gnubg? It takes about 36 hours to re-run the analyses, but that's not a problem.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |