[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Question about higher plies
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Question about higher plies |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:23:03 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:51:21PM +0200, Jim Segrave wrote
>
> I think the classification is probably cheap in CPU time compared to
> the evaluation. What might be profitable is trying to save some of the
> information from the classification for setting up the inputs to the
> neural net. since I'd guess there's a lot of similar work being done.
Yes, I've thought about this as well.
CalculateHalfInputs is the expensive function, and the function is
unfortunately two-sided, so it's not possible to do one-sided caching
which would be very efficient.
Another idea would be to do some one-sided caching storing the first
matrix-vector multiply inside the neural net evaluation.
Joern
pgp6uOyAUm6eX.pgp
Description: PGP signature