[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization
From: |
Nardy Pillards |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:15:41 +0100 |
On 18 Nov 2003 at 23:47, Øystein Johansen wrote:
> Achim Mueller wrote:
> >
> > Interesting: If you don't use "-O" you get only half of the maximum.
>
> My windows builds are built with -O3. I tried several march flags as
> well, but then the executable crashed on several architectures.
>
> I guess Nardy's builds also use -O3. Nardy?
>
> -Øystein
>
They did use 03, but changed it to -0 when 03 gave probs with 3D.
--
Louis Nardy Pillards
"It's better to light a candle, than to curse the darkness"
- [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Achim Mueller, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Øystein Johansen, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization,
Nardy Pillards <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Øystein Johansen, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Jon Kinsey, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Jim Segrave, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Jon Kinsey, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Jim Segrave, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Jon Kinsey, 2003/11/20
Re: [Bug-gnubg] compiling with optimization, Holger, 2003/11/18