[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:07:44 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, , Robert-Jan Veldhuizen wrote:
>I'm quite confident the "old" way of measuring cube error rates,
>dividing by totalCubeDecisions, gave a more realistic result,
>especially in comparison to the checker play error rate, which is also
>based on all unforced moves.
>>>It is also inconsistent, because checker play errors DO get divided by
>>>all unforced moves.
>>So what? If anything I feel that the checker play total error should
>>maybe also be divided not just by non-forced moves, but by non-obvious
>>moves. THis is just harder to quantify.
>Indeed, but my point is that as long as this isn't implemented, it
>would be better not to use it for cube errors either. The relation
>between cube error rate and checker play error rate is IMO clearly more
>realistic when they are both calculated by using similar terms.
I think you are still missing the point that the contributions of
checker play errors and cube play errors are converted to equivalent
rating loss INDEPENDENTLY. There is not a-priory relation between
checker and cube errors.
Kees
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/09
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube, kvandoel, 2003/09/11
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube,
kvandoel <=
- [Bug-gnubg] Re: ratings formula, checker play vs. cube, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/14