[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
Douglas Zare |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:40:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
Quoting Albert Silver <address@hidden>:
> Zare
> pointed out that the Woolsey table at 4-away 3-away looked completely
> wrong compared to the Snowie table for example. Many othger scores may
> be quite correct so testing all the scores may dilute the differences
> one would feel. How about trying a series of match games where the score
> is specifically 4-away 3-away and see how big a difference it makes?
The mwc at a match score is never used at that match score, or shouldn't be.
(This is a problem with some work of Ortega and Kleinman. I don't know whether
they correct this in their book on cubes in match play.) The entry at 3-away
4-away should affect cube decisions at 4-away 4-away greatly, as well as 4-away
5-away and 3-away 5-away.
Douglas Zare
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/09
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/12
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, kvandoel, 2003/09/13
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Ian Shaw, 2003/09/12
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Robert-Jan Veldhuizen, 2003/09/12