[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Réf . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: Réf . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:58:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:11:57PM +0200, Holger wrote
>
> But I can't find any double decision around DP. That's worrying me more.
The logic for "aronud DP" is very crude:
(analysis.c, updateStatcontext):
if( arDouble[ OUTPUT_NODOUBLE ] >= 0.95 ) {
/* around too good point */
...
}
else {
/* around double point */
...
}
Did one of the cube decisions have a no double equity above 0.95?
It has previously been suggested to improve the logic by calculating the
double point (DP) and the too good point (TG), and call it "around TG
point" if the gwc is larger than DP + (TG - DP)/2 (assuming TG>DP).
Jørn
pgpEJ00XkFc5L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?,
Joern Thyssen <=
- Re: Réf... . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf. . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf. . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Holger, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf . . . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29
- Re: R?f.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Jim Segrave, 2003/08/29
- Re: Réf.. . . : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?, Joern Thyssen, 2003/08/29