[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS
From: |
Holger |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2003 17:53:53 +0200 |
At 16:50 30.05.2003 +0200, Olivier Baur wrote:
BTW, is there any place where I could put down some written doc about my
code? Or should I just put this as /* C comments */ in the source files?
Well documented code is always a very nice thing.
Another thing: you will find new lib/vector_xxx.c/h files; they are used
for vector computing, which is currently deactivated by the #define VECTOR
0 macro. I didn't have time (well, name it rather "courage") to remove all
my vector code and maintain two branches.
IMHO it should be ok to leave the code there if it's guarded with #if or
#ifdef and it might be used for any platform or in the near future. Other
opinions?
Last thing: you may have to remove the "-framework Carbon" linker tag in
the main Makefile (which is specific to MacOS).
This could be if-guarded as well.
Regards,
Holger
- [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Olivier Baur, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Joern Thyssen, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS,
Holger <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Joern Thyssen, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Joern Thyssen, 2003/05/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Joern Thyssen, 2003/05/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Olivier Baur, 2003/05/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Multiprocessing and remote processing committed to CVS, Joern Thyssen, 2003/05/31