[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] more on movefilters
From: |
Jim Segrave |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] more on movefilters |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:43:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri 13 Dec 2002 (06:45 +1300), Joseph Heled wrote:
> FindnSaveBestMove(Personally, I think The move filetrs belong only in
> FindBestMovePlied.
>
> FindnSaveBestMove (which is used for analysis) should use another strategy. I
> filter down to 2*N moves using 0 ply, then choose the best N with the
> requested
> ply. Otherwise I can't see the benefit of the analysis done in 2ply if most
> of
> the moves get thrown out by 0ply and have no change of getting evaluated.
>
> -Joseph
>
I'm just curious - could you give more of a sketch of how you think
analysis should be done instead of using movefilters? They seem to me
to be ideally suited to the task, but I assume I'm overlooking something.
--
Jim Segrave address@hidden