To answer the actual question, I'd be fine with a better 0-ply to play
against, and a better 2-ply for my analyses.
Thanks!
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Heled [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:56 PM
To: gnubg; Gary Wong; Øystein O Johansen; Joern Thyssen;
Achim Mueller;
montgomery; max-d; Jim Segrave; Nardy Pillards; Ian Shaw; Steve J.
Baedke; Tore Saanum; MSquonk; Moore, Dave; Albert Silver;
"Pål Schrader"
Subject: race net: 0ply and 1ply
I now have a race net whose 0ply move error (as given by the
race benchmark
which you kindly helped to roll) is 62% of the current net.
The 2ply error is
90% (i.e. 10% better). Alas, 1ply error is twice as large!
This is a somewhat bizarre result. I think I know in part why
and will try to
solve this, but it seems that improving the 1ply will degrade
the 0ply.
This raises a theoretical question. would YOU rather use a
net with better 0ply
and 2ply, or a lesser one with a better 1ply?
Personally, I never use 1ply anymore. I use 0ply for quick,
2ply for more
quality, but I would like your opinion.
-Joseph