Re: [Bug-gnubg] Measuring performance levels 2

[Morten Wang]

* Douglas Zare
> I look forward to seeing gnu 2-ply rollout data, to see if gnu 2-ply
> plays this one better than Snowie 3.

after having checked both the position and my settings to make sure
they were all correct I can now post the 2-ply rollout results:

Win     (g)     (bg)    L(g)    L(bg)   Cubeless        Cubeful
0.1621  0.0000  0.0000  0.0652  0.0123  -0.7533         n/a
0.0011  0.0000  0.0000  0.0006  0.0002   0.0022         n/a

(21600 trials, no truncation, seed 11, w/rotate rolls & variance
reduction, world class settings w/o cubeful chequer eval, cubeless
rollout and the Jacoby rule turned off)


Morten!

-- 
"...a liquid which was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea."
  My opinions are not necessarily those of my provider,
  not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary.