bug-gnu-utils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug#504356: gettext-el: duplicates gettext header with Emacs 23 (fwd


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: Bug#504356: gettext-el: duplicates gettext header with Emacs 23 (fwd)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:00:05 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Hello Intrigeri,

> at least in Emacs 23, opening a PO file with po-mode unconditionally
> adds a new header on top of the file, even if one (or more... the
> problem is recursive) header is already present.
> 
> This problem does not happen in Emacs 22, that's why I do not set this
> as grave, but I believe it deserves "important", because po-mode does
> not provide any easy way to remove this duplicate header: once the PO
> has been saved, I have to edit it with another editor to fix the mess.
> 
> I've tracked down the issue to line 1346 (in po-check-file-header):
> (previous-line 1) moves to the end of the previous line, don't ask me
> why.
> 
> The docstring for previous-line clearly says it should not be used
> blindly in a Lisp program:
> 
>    If you are thinking of using this in a Lisp program, consider using
>    `forward-line' with a negative argument instead.  It is usually easier
>    to use and more reliable (no dependence on goal column, etc.).
> 
> Replacing this with (forward-line -1) fixes the issue (one-liner patch
> attached).
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> --- /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gettext/po-mode.el     2008-08-27 
> 19:03:06.000000000 +0200
> +++ po-mode.el        2008-11-02 22:15:21.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@
>              (progn
>                ;; There is at least one entry.
>                (goto-char (match-beginning 0))
> -              (previous-line 1)
> +              (forward-line -1)
>                (setq end-of-header (match-end 0))
>                (if (looking-at "msgid \"\"\n")
>                    ;; There is indeed a PO file header.

Thank you for the report and patch. It will be contained in the next
gettext release.

Santiago, feel free to patch the gettext-0.17 package in Debian with this
patch, as long as gettext 0.18 is not released.

Bruno





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]