[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gperf output licensing
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: gperf output licensing |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:43:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Hi,
James Hook asked:
> Is the source code output of the gperf utility covered by GPL?
The general guideline for this question is: Does of output contain
significant portions of the source code of the tool? Only then is the
output considered as a "derivative work" of the tool.
In the case of gperf, the output contains only small pieces of a few lines,
such as:
#ifdef __GNUC__
__inline
#else
#ifdef __cplusplus
inline
#endif
#endif
These pieces are too small for being significant.
Therefore the conclusion is that GPERF's output is not a derivative work
of GPERF, and therefore can be used without restrictions.
Bruno
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: gperf output licensing,
Bruno Haible <=