[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking
From: |
Manu |
Subject: |
Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:21:00 +0200 |
Earnie Boyd wrote:
[...]
> Well, I've been contemplating modifying MinGW's unistd.h anyway for
> this. Seems the right thing to do since unistd.h is a convenience MinGW
> add on for UNIX programs anyway. Manu, since you started this, do you
> want to do the honors of patching the MinGW unistd.h file?
Yes, of course :)
> You should
> use the _mkdir MS version in the body of the definition.
Ok, I'll commit my changes.
Manu.
- Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, (continued)
- Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/10/24
- Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/24
- Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/24
- Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Manu, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Paul Eggert, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Manu, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Earnie Boyd, 2003/10/26
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Earnie Boyd, 2003/10/25
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking,
Manu <=
- Re: [Mingw-users] Re: More patch 2.5.9 hacking, Earnie Boyd, 2003/10/25