Re: Please confirm your message

[Jude DaShiell]

On 2003-01-26 address@hidden said:
   >Your e-mail message with the subject of "--directory= bug"
   >is being held because your address was not recognized.
   >To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
   >to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
   >address@hidden
   >This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
   >junk-mail.
   >[ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.59 (http://tmda.net/),
   >an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
   >--- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
   >From address@hidden Sun Jan 26 08:31:46 2003
   >Return-path: <address@hidden>
   >Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
   >by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
   >id 18cmsz-0001ix-00
   >for address@hidden; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:45 -0500
   >Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
   >by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
   >id 18cmsz-0008Nz-00
   >for address@hidden; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:45 -0500
   >Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
   >4.10.13) id 18cmsc-0001Gs-00
   >for address@hidden; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:23 -0500
   >Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61])
   >by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
   >id 18cmsc-0001FV-00
   >for address@hidden; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:22 -0500
   >Received: from 66-44-1-118.s372.apx1.lnh.md.dialup.rcn.com ([66.44.
   >1.118] helo=auth1.dns.rcn.net)
   >by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
   >id 18cmsX-0000FX-00
   >for address@hidden; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:21 -0500
   >MIME-Version: 1.0
   >Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:27:29 +500+
   >X-Mailer: Net-Tamer 1.12.0
   >X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.1 required=5.0
   >tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,INVALID_DATE,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,
   >SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_OSIRU_DUL,X_OSIRU_DUL_FH
   >version=2.41
   >X-Spam-Flag: YES
   >X-Spam-Level: *****
   >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.41 (1.115.2.8-2002-09-05-exp)
   >X-Spam-Report:   5.10 hits, 5 required;
   >*  1.6 -- Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
   >*  0.6 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low)
   >*  1.5 -- Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
   >*  0.4 -- RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
   >[RBL check: found 118.1.44.66.relays.osirusoft.com., type:
   >127.0.0.3]
   >*  0.6 -- RBL: DNSBL: sender ip address in in a dialup block
   >*  0.4 -- RBL: Received from first hop dialup listed in relays.
   >osirusoft.com [RBL check: found 118.1.44.66.relays.osirusoft.com.,
   >type: 127.0.0.3]
   >the --directory= option in the version of gnu tar that went out
   >with gcc 2.95 and slackware 8.0 does not perform as documented.  I
   >found this out by trying to backup the /boot directory first and
   >upon testing the archive found only files I knew to be only located
   >in /root on my system.  I've gotten around the bug by using cd
   >/boot and cd /etc and so on before tar runs each time to control
   >where tar starts its backup each time.
   >----
   >Jude <dashiell(at)starpower-dot-net>
   >ype your tagline here.
   >Net-Tamer V 1.12.0 - Registered

----
Jude <dashiell(at)starpower-dot-net>

ype your tagline here.

Net-Tamer V 1.12.0 - Registered