[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from
From: |
Miek Gieben |
Subject: |
Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:34:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Vim/Mutt/Linux |
[On 22 Jan, @15:26, Stepan wrote in "Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-increm ..."]
> Hello,
> thank you for your bug report.
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:44:41AM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> > simular to this: tar --files-from FILELIST --listed-incremental INCLIST.
> >
> > Now if I list directories in FILELIST, incremental backups work, but if I
> > list specific files in FILELIST, they are always stored in the archive.
> >
> > Is this a bug?
>
> last time I saw the source code, I noticed that tar will probably behave
> this way. But the source seemed quite confusing to me and I thought
> noone will actually encounter the bug.
>
> You did. :-)
>
> OK, I'd say this _is_ a bug.
>
> But I'm not brave enough to fix it. I don't know whether the tar
> maintainer has enough energy to work on it.
well, I also looked at the source code, and you're right about it being
confusing. But I still have hopes that a fix is not that hard to produce.
But who is the _current_ maintainer of tar? README and Changelog are years
old...
> There is a workaround, though:
> create a temporary directory, put there hard links to the files you want
> incrementally backup, and put the name of that directory to the filelist.
>
> This way it should work.
hmmm, i'm using tar in another program (hdup), to produce backups. I cannot be
sure that all the files that are being backupped are on the same partition.
Actually, chances of that being the case are rather slim.
> In case you decide to fix the bug yourself, be sure to start with the
> newest version available:
>
> - get tar-1.13.25
>
> - get my patch which tried to solve a related issue:
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2003-01/msg00019.html
> the bug report which made me to write that patch is available from:
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-12/msg00248.html
>
> Of course, I don't know whether the maintainer will accept my patch, so
> I cannot tell you whether you should use it if you decide to produce a patch.
>
> Hope this helps,
it does,
thanks,
grtz Miek
- gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/15
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Stepan Kasal, 2003/01/22
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from,
Miek Gieben <=
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/24
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/24
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/26
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Stepan Kasal, 2003/01/27
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/28
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Stepan Kasal, 2003/01/28
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Miek Gieben, 2003/01/29
- Re: gnu tar w/ --listed-incremental --files-from, Stepan Kasal, 2003/01/29