bug-gnu-utils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cannot build cross-bfd for hppa on i686


From: Sascha Brawer
Subject: Cannot build cross-bfd for hppa on i686
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 16:06:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020610

Hi,

I am trying to build binutils-2.13 for target=hppa-hp-hpux10.20, host=i686-pc-linux-gnu using gcc 2.95.3.

The compilation aborts upon linking bfd. Steps to reproduce, with output:

% mkdir hpbinut && cd hpbinut
% ../binutils-2.13/config.guess
i686-pc-linux-gnu
% gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)

% ../binutils-2.13/configure --target=hppa-hp-hpux10.20
% make
[...]
bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname':
/tmp/binutils-2.13/binutils/bucomm.c:236: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(targets.o): In function `find_target':
/tmp/binutils-2.13/bfd/targets.c(.data+0x4): undefined reference to `som_vec' /tmp/binutils-2.13/bfd/targets.c(.rodata+0x0): undefined reference to `som_vec'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [size] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/hpbinut/binutils'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/hpbinut/binutils'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/hpbinut/binutils'
make: *** [all-binutils] Error 2

I've searched the list archive for other recent hppa/HP-UX related binutil bugs ([1] - [6]), but none of them seem related to this one.

Please tell me if there is any further information that might be helpful in resolving the bug. Thanks a lot for having made binutils, by the way!

-- Sascha Brawer, brawer at acm dot org

[1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q3/msg00014.html
[2] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q2/msg00305.html
[3] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q1/msg00285.html
[4] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q1/msg00231.html
[5] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q1/msg00165.html
[6] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-binutils/2002-q1/msg00117.html






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]