Re: sed 3.02 bug

[Huy Le]

Wow, it's correct?!?!

Yeah, I expected a '@'.

Damn, I think I need to relearn my regular expressions....
Do you have a document on the web where I can look up this particular
rule?

Thanks,
Huy

On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:52:04 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> address@hidden (Huy Le) writes:
> 
> |> address@hidden +D ~/.procmail% echo '\?' | sed 's/\\\?/@/g'
> |> @@?@
> 
> This is correct.  Perhaps this is what you want (I can only guess, you
> didn't tell us what you expect):
> 
> $ echo '\?' | sed 's/\\?/@/g'
> @
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
> SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N?rnberg
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>