[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?
From: |
Clark Morgan |
Subject: |
Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2001 07:30:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 04:04:53PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Clark O. Morgan" <cmorganOaracnet.com> writes:
>
> |> $ ./expr "abcdef" : '.*u\?'
> |> 6
> |> $ ./expr "abcdef" : '.*b\?'
> |> 6 <--- this looks wrong
>
> No, this is correct. The '.*' regexp matches the maximum possible length,
> which is all 6 characters. Since b is optional, it does not cause a match
> failure.
In that case, \? is worthless (i.e., can't tell the difference
between a match or nonmatch).
- is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Clark O. Morgan, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Andreas Schwab, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?,
Clark Morgan <=
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Andreas Schwab, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Clark Morgan, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Andreas Schwab, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Clark Morgan, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Andreas Schwab, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Clark Morgan, 2001/08/23
- Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Paul Jarc, 2001/08/23
Re: is expr's \? regex metachar working?, Clark O. Morgan, 2001/08/23