Re: unify for patchutils

[Paul Eggert]

> From: Tim Waugh <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:28:46 +0100
> 
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:30:56AM -0400, Marc Boucher wrote:
> 
> > thanks for pointing this out, but imho it would be much more logical
> > for unify(1) to be part of the patchutils (or even diffutils), rather than
> > wdiff, which is mainly a word diff finder!
> 
> I've no objection.

I think it belongs in diffutils.  On my list of things to do is to
merge wdiff in with diffutils.  Merging wdiff won't happen with the
next diffutils release, alas, as I'm already piled too high with
things to do....