bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#72296: 29.4; cperl-mode parsing error


From: Harald Jörg
Subject: bug#72296: 29.4; cperl-mode parsing error
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:06:35 +0000

tags 72296 confirmed
severity 72296 normal
owner 72296 Harald Jörg <haj@posteo.de>
thanks

brian <me@briang.org> writes:

> I started emacs using 'emacs -Q /tmp/some-empty-file.pl' and activated
> cperl mode by 'M-x cperl-mode'. I typed 'for (2..$n/2) {}' into the
> empty buffer and as soon as I pressed '/' there was an error message in
> the minibuffer
>
> End of ‘/ ... /’ string/RE not found: (scan-error Unbalanced
> parentheses 11 38)
>
> and syntax hilighting was broken. Inserting a single space before '$'
> cleared the error and fixed the hilighting.

I can reproduce this and am about to prepare a fix.

That code sits here since 1997, I find it rather surprising that it has
not surfaced until now.  I'll run some tests and add a test case.  If I
am not mistaken, then replacing a `progn` with `save-excursion` should
do the trick:

index b85db699e72..34481925d3e 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/cperl-mode.el
@@ -4108,7 +4108,7 @@ cperl-find-pods-heres
                                    (and (eq (preceding-char) ?\})
                                         (cperl-after-block-p (point-min)))
                                    (and (eq (char-syntax (preceding-char)) ?w)
-                                        (progn
+                                        (save-excursion
                                           (forward-sexp -1)
 ;; After these keywords `/' starts a RE.  One should add all the
 ;; functions/builtins which expect an argument, but ...

In newer versions the line numbers are different (~4650) but the issue
is the same.  The unprotected (forward-sexp -1) skips over $n and the
two characters before that are '..' which, in the following clause,
makes the construct look like a flip-flop operator where '/' does start
a regular expression.  Using 'save-excursion' undoes the skip before
running the next checks.

-- 
Cheers,
haj





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]