[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#72069: [PATCH] Move configuration of auto-mode-alist out of js-ts-mo
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#72069: [PATCH] Move configuration of auto-mode-alist out of js-ts-mode |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:05:55 -0700 |
Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me> writes:
> The current version of the code requires the `js-ts-mode' function to
> have already been executed for `auto-mode-alist' to contain an entry for
> ".jsx" files. The patch makes sure that `auto-mode-alist' is updates
> when js.el is loaded.
Thanks for the patch.
What about js-mode? Shouldn't that be used out-of-the-box for these files?
>>From 7fc9bb52a9f51a8caf4d5d016dc8a8812dd5c6a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:50:45 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Move configuration of auto-mode-alist out of js-ts-mode
>
> * lisp/progmodes/js.el (js-ts-mode): Remove configuration of
> auto-mode-alist.
> ---
> lisp/progmodes/js.el | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/js.el b/lisp/progmodes/js.el
> index f8140c14a49..c3e6077a352 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/js.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/js.el
> @@ -3957,10 +3957,10 @@ js-ts-mode
> "method_definition")
> eos)
> nil nil)))
> - (treesit-major-mode-setup)
> + (treesit-major-mode-setup)))
>
> - (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist
> - '("\\(\\.js[mx]\\|\\.har\\)\\'" . js-ts-mode))))
> +(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist
> + '("\\(\\.js[mx]\\|\\.har\\)\\'" . js-ts-mode))
Shouldn't this be wrapped in
(if (treesit-ready-p js) ...)
?
>
> (derived-mode-add-parents 'js-ts-mode '(js-mode))