[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?
From: |
Pip Cet |
Subject: |
bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:12:45 +0000 |
On Wednesday, June 26th, 2024 at 09:08, martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
> gets me nil too. So to make such tests work one has to tinker with
> that obsolete variable 'values'. Worrisome.
I believe that change, in commit 84f72f19e514db8f8f6e469340fb5fa0719d40b6,
might have been unintentional. Stefan: is it intentional that the default
behavior was changed to modify "values", even if eval-expression-debug-on-error
is `t`?
Pip
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, martin rudalics, 2024/06/25
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Pip Cet, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, martin rudalics, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Pip Cet, 2024/06/27
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, martin rudalics, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?,
Pip Cet <=
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, martin rudalics, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/26
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, martin rudalics, 2024/06/27
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/27
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/28
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/28
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/28
- bug#71774: 31.0.50; Hash table weakness broken?, Pip Cet, 2024/06/27