Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:55:32 -0700
Cc: 71655@debbugs.gnu.org, james@literate-devops.io
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
I don't have a strong preference myself, but the latter seems
ever-so-slightly safer to me. This bug happened because we can't read
the file when trying to insert it, so ignoring file errors would cover
any other situations we haven't predicted. On the other hand, maybe
there's a case where we *want* the 'insert-file-contents-literally'
error to signal so that we don't try to execute the file normally (I
can't think of any such cases, though).
Why not do both? If the file has zero size, reading it is pointless,
and if reading it signals an error, we cannot examine it for the
interpreter signature.