bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#70796: 30.0.50; bug-reference-mode leading to constant GCing


From: Gerd Möllmann
Subject: bug#70796: 30.0.50; bug-reference-mode leading to constant GCing
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:02:31 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:

> Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Okay, so this is what I tried:
>>>
>>> I bootstrapped two Emacs from current master (7be66d8223e) one
>>> --with-native-compilation=yes the other --with-native-compilation=no
>>> and boths with Gerd patch applied.
>>>
>>> Also I checkout current scratch/igc (2343d55dff4) to get igc.org.
>>>
>>> I then tried to run with boths native/non-native emacsen with:
>>>
>>> .../src/emacs -eval '(setq garbage-collection-messages t)' -Q
>>> ~/emacs4/admin/igc.org
>>>
>>> Once started looking in *Messages* I see 7 GC cycles in the the
>>> non-native build and 5 in the native one, also I can scroll without
>>> issues or other GC cycles.
>>>
>>> Note that only during the first start the native copiled Emacs did a
>>> number of GC cycles more to jit some code but I guess that's expected.
>>>
>>> Am I trying to repruduce this correctly?
>>
>> Yes.  And you also need to put some function in addition to
>> font-lock-fontify-region in jit-lock-functions, either by enabling
>> bug-reference-mode, goto-address-mode, or simply defining
>>
>>   (defun i-do-nothing (start end) nil)
>>
>> and then M-: (jit-lock-register #'i-do-nothing) RET in the igc.org
>> buffer.
>>
>> Bye,
>>   Tassilo
>
> Okay I tried both your suggestion both Gerd's one on the native compiled
> instance with no effect on the number of GC cycles (I'm on GNU/Linux X86-64).
>
> The best I can do is to try later this afternoon on GNU/Linux AArch64
> and see if something changes.

Thanks. I'm still suspecting either macOS or libgccjit 14 on arm64, BTW,
or a combination. But I guess I already mentioned that :-).





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]