[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:06:05 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>, stefankangas@gmail.com,
> eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:55:53 -0400
>
> > Technically, this is okay, but I'd like to hear from Stefan about
> > whether it's correct to insert process output before the markers.
>
> AFAIK, when the insertion is done by the default process filter, it's
> indeed done "before the markers". I have no idea why it's done this
> way and would have preferred it to be different in many cases, but it's
> been that way forever and changing it would inevitably break some code.
OK, thanks. I guess compatibility wins here.
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/08
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/08
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/11
- bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max,
Eli Zaretskii <=