|
From: | Nicholas Vollmer |
Subject: | bug#71404: 30.0.50; [WISHLIST] string-edit-mode should allow changing major mode |
Date: | Fri, 07 Jun 2024 19:37:24 -0400 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
From: Nicholas Vollmer <nv@parenthetic.dev> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 11:50:16 -0400 string-edit-mode is a nice feature to have built in.It already is? Or what do you mean by "built in" here?
Correct. It is. I was just commenting that I'm glad to see it part of Emacs, rather than re-implemented over and over in third-party packages.
That is all.
It would be nice if one could change the major mode of the editing buffer while preserving the edit/abort functionality and any buffer state necessary to make those function.Any reason it couldn't be implemented as a minor mode?In what major modes will this make sense as a minor mode?
Many. For example. If the string to edit is an elisp form, why shouldn't the editing buffer be emacs-lisp-mode? If the string to edit is a message which can be formatted with markdown, why not markdown-mode? (I ran into this yesterday when implementing a command for personal use). I can imagine many scenarios where the major mode could be something other than text-mode. It seems to me that it would make more sense for the "abort/finish" key bindings to be bound to a minor mode map so the editing buffer can be much more flexible.
IOW, I don't think I understand what you mean by "preserving the edit/abort functionality and buffer state", so please elaborate.
The buffer has some local state (e.g. the abort callback function, header-line) stored in a buffer-local variables which are not preserved when the major mode is changed.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |