bug#71379: 29.3; Elisp compiler: warnings for formats given insufficiently many arguments

[Stefan Kangas]

Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com> writes:

> 6 juni 2024 kl. 06.38 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
>> On second thought, this is still fine to go in now, but I wonder
>> whether we should move these to the places where the corresponding
>> functions are defined, and leave in bytecomp.c only those which are
>> primitives defined in C?  That would mean 'warn' and 'user-error'
>> should be moved to their respective Lisp files.
>
> Indeed it's a question I always ask myself every so often, and sometimes we 
> distribute properties to definitions.
> However, in this case it seems better to keep them in one place: it's only a 
> small handful of functions, and this way the properties are kept local to the 
> byte-compiler.

No strong opinion, but I think this cuts both ways: keeping it local to
the definition of the functions themselves makes it clear to anyone
looking there for inspiration how to add such warnings to their own
`format` functions.