[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function |
Date: |
Wed, 29 May 2024 18:54:39 +0300 |
> From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
> Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, 71117@debbugs.gnu.org,
> andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:17:39 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 71117@debbugs.gnu.org,
> >> andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de
> >> Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:25:05 -0400
> >>
> >> Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Thinking of e.g. 'C-h 4' (for the "other-window" connotation) or 'C-h H'
> >> > (for "current _H_elp buffer"); help-find-source would then be bound to
> >> > 'C-h 4 s', for example.
> >> >
> >> > (info-other-window currently hogs 'C-h 4 i' unfortunately… though
> >> > nowadays 'C-x 4 4 i' also works, and 'C-x 4 i' is currently free 🤔
> >> >
> >> > 'C-x 4 h' is also free to use as a prefix, but maybe a bit of a
> >> > fingerful)
> >> >
> >> > Don't give too much weight to my ramblings; I find 'C-h z' a bit
> >> > cryptic, but I don't know that my alternatives are better.
> >>
> >> I think those are actually good points, 'C-h z' is not very nice and
> >> 'C-h 4 s' would be probably easier to remember as 's' has the same
> >> meaning in the *Help* buffer it-self.
> >
> > I don't want to rebind "C-h 4 i", but "C-h 4 s" or "C-h 4 RET" should
> > be good.
> >
> > This also needs an update in NEWS and the manual.
>
> Okay done, please have a look as usual.
LGTM, thanks.
> Also, we have a warning now on master because lisp/ldefs-boot.el needs
> to be regenerated. I did run admin/update_autogen but the diff is a
> little bigger then I expected (is not only related to the introduced
> function). Should I commit this? Do we have another way to regenerate
> ldefs-boot.el we typically use?
I never use admin/update_autogen, I just regenerate loaddefs.el (as in
"make -C lisp autoloads-force") and the do what make-tarball.txt says:
5. Copy lisp/loaddefs.el to lisp/ldefs-boot.el. After copying, edit
ldefs-boot.el to add
;; no-byte-compile: t
to its file-local variables section, otherwise make-dist will
complain.
And I just did that, so we should be okay for a while.
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, (continued)
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/22
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2024/05/22
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/23
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/28
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/28
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/28
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2024/05/28
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/28
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/29
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/29
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/29
- bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/29
bug#71117: 30.0.50; output of describe-function, Juri Linkov, 2024/05/23