[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display |
Date: |
Tue, 28 May 2024 18:55:40 +0300 |
> From: Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:36:05 +0000
> Cc: 71224@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> I forgot whether in this case (#71224) the stack was also near the stack
> limit. Maybe when it's so close to a
> stack overflow, these SIGSEGV can happen first.
AFAIU, this is nowhere near the C stack limit. The Lisp nesting is
near its limit, but that's a far cry from exhausting the C stack,
AFAICT.
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/27
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/27
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/28
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/28
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/28
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/28
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/28
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/29
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/29
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Daniel Clemente, 2024/05/30
- bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/30