bug#70815: [PATCH] ; Enahnce python-tests.el to adapt different python interpreters

[kobarity]

Lin Sun wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:04 PM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lin Sun wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 3:53 PM kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > > Cc: kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com>
> > > > > > From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 22:20:44 +0000
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It makes sense to look for "python3", but is it really useful to 
> > > > > > look
> > > > > > for "python2" at this point?
> > > > > I don't think we want to drop Python 2.x support, not yet.
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to drop Python 2 support either, but I don't think the
> > > > addition of the "python2" command is mandatory.  As the current master
> > > > does not run the "python2" command either.  However, I don't think it
> > > > is a bad idea to add the "python2" command.
> > > >
> > > > Lin Sun wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I attached the latest patch, hope it resolved all your concerns.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Lin,
> > > > There is still a typo "Enahnce" in the summary line, and there is a
> > > > typo in the docstring of `python-tests-get-shell-interpreter' as well.
> > > >
> > > > > > If there is only python2 in the PATH and no python or python3, some 
> > > > > > tests will fail.
> > > > > It's caused by the python.el didn't search "python2", so it may need
> > > > > another patch to change python.el.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so.  Attached is a diff to your patch to resolve this
> > > > issue.  It let-binds `python-shell-interpreter' in some ERTs.  It
> > > > also includes the fix of the typo in the docstring of
> > > > `python-tests-get-shell-interpreter'.
> > > >
> > > > Without these modifications, EMACS_PYTHON_INTERPRETER will not work as
> > > > expected either on those ERTs.
> > > >
> > > > As for EMACS_PYTHON_INTERPRETER, I am a little doubtful that it is the
> > > > right thing to introduce.  It allows the ERT runner to specify the
> > > > interpreter.  It's OK for ERTs that can be run on both Python 2 and 3,
> > > > but you may want to write an ERT that can only be run on Python 3.
> > >
> > > Thank you for the comments, now get your points and agree with you.
> > > I merged your patch together, also corrected the typo in the commit 
> > > message.
> > > Please help review the attached patch. Thank you !
> >
> > Sorry, there was a problem in my diff.  Two tests fail when
> > EMACS_PYTHON_INTERPRETER is not found.  Please apply the attached
> > diff.  It also includes a suggestion for improving the error message.
> > Please consider.
> 
> Merged your changes and tested on my local (with python/python3), it
> works perfectly. Thank you.
> 
> And the patch file is attached .

Thanks, it looks good to me.