[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, pa
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29 |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:38:49 +0000 |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 9:57 PM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 9:14 PM <miha@kamnitnik.top> wrote:
> >
> > João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > > + (dolist (p (delq proc (process-list)))
> > > + (when (tramp-file-name-equal-p v (process-get p 'vector))
> > > + (while (accept-process-output p 0)))))
> >
> > I think that accept-process-output with JUST-THIS-ONE=nil is dangerous
> > here. We are now allowing 'file-exists-p', 'expand-file-name' and all
> > other functions listed in 'tramp-sh-file-name-handler-alist' to call any
> > timer or process filter,
>
> That's exactly what we want. We _don't_ want to stop other
> output to be inhibited from going into the filter.
Doh, this is a silly double negative. I meant "we don't want to
inhibit other output from going into the filters".
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, (continued)
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/15
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/15
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/16
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29,
João Távora <=
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, miha, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/17
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, Michael Albinus, 2023/03/18
- bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29, João Távora, 2023/03/18