[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2023 07:49:03 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:
> Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>>>> Cc: 61960@debbugs.gnu.org, hi-angel@yandex.ru
>>>> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 14:59:24 +0000
>>>>
>>>> > if test "${with_native_compilation}" != "no"; then
>>>> > if test "${HAVE_PDUMPER}" = no; then
>>>> > AC_MSG_ERROR(['--with-native-compilation' requires
>>>> > '--with-dumping=pdumper'])
>>>> > fi
>>>>
>>>> So IIUC we can compile emacs with both unexec and pdumper support, they
>>>> are not mutually exclusive, and we can specify which one to use for the
>>>> first dump with --with-dumping.
>>>>
>>>> So yeah I think we have to prevent native compilation to be compiled
>>>> with unexec support, even if it's not the way Emacs is dumped the first
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> OK, then a simple change to the above condition (and maybe a slight
>>> change in the message wording as well) should achieve that, right?
>>
>> Emacs can't be built with both unexec and pdumper dumping, and configure
>> doesn't let you do that. So what we have is fine.
>
> On emacs 29
>
> configure --without-x --with-native-compilation --with-unexec=yes
> --with-pdumper=yes
>
> does succeed so I don't think it is fine.
What is the resulting config.h? The quality of configure's error
reporting has gone down in the past several years. --with-unexec is
silently ignored if you specify --with-pdumper.
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, (continued)
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05
- Message not available
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/03/04
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/03/04
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/03/04
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Po Lu, 2023/03/04
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05
- Message not available
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/06
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Andrea Corallo, 2023/03/07
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/07
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Po Lu, 2023/03/11
- Message not available
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup,
Po Lu <=
- Message not available
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Po Lu, 2023/03/15
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/15
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Po Lu, 2023/03/15
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/16
- Message not available
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Po Lu, 2023/03/15
- bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/16
bug#61960: 30.0.50; Unexec build reliably crashes during loadup, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/05