|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#61667: 29.0.60; Failure to redisplay |
Date: | Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:35:20 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 |
On 24/02/2023 17:12, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:14:31 +0200 Cc: Gregory Heytings<gregory@heytings.org>,61667@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru> The problem is in the noticeable delay between me pressing 'a' and seeing the contents of the window updated. When the frame title doesn't change, we simply can't track it as an additional symptom (that the buffer has been successfully visited, but the frame display remains the same). But whether the title changes or not, I can easily see the delay between me pressing 'a' and the contents of the window being updated. Or its absence.So now you are saying that the changing title of the frame is_not_ the cause of the problem? You are now saying that the delay_always_ happens, and that the change in the frame's title just makes it easier to spot that delay?
I just said that unchanging title doesn't stop me from seeing the delay when there is, in fact, a delay.
So when you earlier wrote that a constant frame title makes the problem disappear, you were mistaken, and the constant title just makes the problem harder to spot? And the delay exists no matter whether the frame's title changes or not?
No, I stand by the earlier assessment. Sorry if some of the phrasing was confusing.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |