[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, def
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:56:15 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 04:31:08 +0200
> Cc: casouri@gmail.com, 61655@debbugs.gnu.org, jacob.fai@gmail.com,
> Randy Taylor <dev@rjt.dev>, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
>
> > I'm okay with adding a few more faces to emacs-29, but please hurry,
> > as we don't have too much time for more additions.
>
> Here's the patch which adds the faces and their uses in all ts modes.
LGTM, thanks.
> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split
> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.
What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
indistinguishable by default?
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, (continued)
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Yuan Fu, 2023/02/21
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/21
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Jacob Faibussowitsch, 2023/02/21
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/21
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Jacob Faibussowitsch, 2023/02/22
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/22
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Yuan Fu, 2023/02/22
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/22
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/23
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Randy Taylor, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Randy Taylor, 2023/02/24
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/25
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/02/27
- bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/25