[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*
From: |
Manuel Giraud |
Subject: |
bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-* |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:16:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> Thanks. I have a few comments:
Hi Eli,
Here is a new version that adresses most of your comments.
0001-More-doc-on-image-dired-dired-bug-61624.patch
Description: Text Data
[...]
>> You can delete images through Image-Dired also. Type @kbd{d}
>> (@code{image-dired-flag-thumb-original-file}) to flag the image file
>> -for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also delete the thumbnail
>> +for deletion in the Dired buffer. You can also remove the thumbnail
>> image from the thumbnail buffer with @kbd{C-d}
>> (@code{image-dired-delete-char}).
>
> Not sure I understand the reason for this. "Deletion" goes together
> with "delete", so why use "remove" instead?
You're right that it goes with "delete" from the command name but I
thought that "remove" is better because no file is deleted from this
operation. Only the thumbnail is removed from the thumbnails buffer.
Maybe my english is a bit off here.
--
Manuel Giraud
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Manuel Giraud, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*,
Manuel Giraud <=
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Stefan Kangas, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Manuel Giraud, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/19
- bug#61624: 30.0.50; [PATCH] More doc on image-dired-dired-*, Stefan Kangas, 2023/02/19